Comments on: Windows 7 + WMP 12 == Bad! http://www.cravingtech.com/windows-7-wmp-12-bad.html Tech news, reviews, and a geek's ramblings Sun, 08 Nov 2009 04:01:31 +1100 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 By: Mike Johnson http://www.cravingtech.com/windows-7-wmp-12-bad.html/comment-page-1#comment-10589 Mike Johnson Tue, 24 Mar 2009 19:58:24 +0000 http://www.cravingtech.com/blog/?p=2265#comment-10589 It's not as awful as it sounds. It does effect files on occasion but certainly shouldn't take out your whole library. It’s not as awful as it sounds. It does effect files on occasion but certainly shouldn’t take out your whole library.

]]> By: Michael Aulia http://www.cravingtech.com/windows-7-wmp-12-bad.html/comment-page-1#comment-9374 Michael Aulia Thu, 08 Jan 2009 23:19:38 +0000 http://www.cravingtech.com/blog/?p=2265#comment-9374 Haha perhaps. Although I heard that the official copy (released to testers) also had this bug. So I guess it wasn't intentional Haha perhaps. Although I heard that the official copy (released to testers) also had this bug. So I guess it wasn’t intentional

]]> By: Your PC Info http://www.cravingtech.com/windows-7-wmp-12-bad.html/comment-page-1#comment-9364 Your PC Info Thu, 08 Jan 2009 05:36:49 +0000 http://www.cravingtech.com/blog/?p=2265#comment-9364 Thats really an awful bug! <abbr><em>Your PC Info´s last blog post..<a href="http://yourpcinfo.blogspot.com/2009/01/software-review-launchy.html" rel="nofollow">Software Review : Launchy v 2.1.2</a></abbr></em> Thats really an awful bug!

Your PC Info´s last blog post..Software Review : Launchy v 2.1.2

]]> By: Sire http://www.cravingtech.com/windows-7-wmp-12-bad.html/comment-page-1#comment-9353 Sire Wed, 07 Jan 2009 05:30:21 +0000 http://www.cravingtech.com/blog/?p=2265#comment-9353 Perhaps that is true, but it wouldn't be too hard to leak a copy with the same build number but with a few intentional bugs in it just for a bit of fun. A disgruntled employee even? <abbr><em>Sire´s last blog post..<a href="http://wassupblog.com/commenting-101-important-rules-for-2009/" rel="nofollow">Commenting 101 Important Rules For 2009</a></abbr></em> Perhaps that is true, but it wouldn’t be too hard to leak a copy with the same build number but with a few intentional bugs in it just for a bit of fun. A disgruntled employee even?

Sire´s last blog post..Commenting 101 Important Rules For 2009

]]> By: Michael Aulia http://www.cravingtech.com/windows-7-wmp-12-bad.html/comment-page-1#comment-9344 Michael Aulia Tue, 06 Jan 2009 12:52:06 +0000 http://www.cravingtech.com/blog/?p=2265#comment-9344 Not too sure about that myself :) I don't think it's intentional though as the public beta release would have the same bug (same build number) Not too sure about that myself :) I don’t think it’s intentional though as the public beta release would have the same bug (same build number)

]]>