<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thumbs up for ESET NOD32 version 4 public beta 1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cravingtech.com/eset-nod32-version-4-public-beta-1-review-impression.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cravingtech.com/eset-nod32-version-4-public-beta-1-review-impression.html</link>
	<description>Tech news, reviews, and a geek&#039;s ramblings</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 01:26:38 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Aulia</title>
		<link>http://www.cravingtech.com/eset-nod32-version-4-public-beta-1-review-impression.html/comment-page-1#comment-11301</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Aulia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 11:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cravingtech.com/blog/?p=2284#comment-11301</guid>
		<description>Such a lengthy comment but thank you very much for sharing your insights here, Goyta. 

I&#039;d say that no software is perfect just like saying that nobody&#039;s perfect :) On the previous version (can&#039;t remember which one it is now), Kaspersky detected a few more trojans in my computer compared to NOD32. But I wasn&#039;t sure whether it&#039;s real or whether it&#039;s a false alarm. I haven&#039;t tried its latest version so unfortunately I can&#039;t give any comparison to that. However, your comment does add a value to this post so thanks for sharing again</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Such a lengthy comment but thank you very much for sharing your insights here, Goyta. </p>
<p>I&#8217;d say that no software is perfect just like saying that nobody&#8217;s perfect <img src='http://www.cravingtech.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  On the previous version (can&#8217;t remember which one it is now), Kaspersky detected a few more trojans in my computer compared to NOD32. But I wasn&#8217;t sure whether it&#8217;s real or whether it&#8217;s a false alarm. I haven&#8217;t tried its latest version so unfortunately I can&#8217;t give any comparison to that. However, your comment does add a value to this post so thanks for sharing again</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Goyta' F. Villela Jr.</title>
		<link>http://www.cravingtech.com/eset-nod32-version-4-public-beta-1-review-impression.html/comment-page-1#comment-11296</link>
		<dc:creator>Goyta' F. Villela Jr.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 02:20:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cravingtech.com/blog/?p=2284#comment-11296</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s 4 months later now, and I&#039;m already testing the commercially released NOD32 4.0. I&#039;ve been a Kaspersky user for many years, but lately I&#039;ve been submitting a few suspicious files to Virustotal and found that Kaspersky isn&#039;t what it used to be any more and is missing way too much malware. Since I&#039;m trying Windows 7 RC (in dual-boot with XP, where Kaspersky remains), I thought this could be a chance to try something else. Since NOD32 is so highly praised and works on Windows 7, a trial was more than in order. (Windows 7 is so good and stable, even at this RC stage, that I moan and groan when I have to boot to XP for some reason! I&#039;m LOVING it!)

Well, I didn&#039;t like it so far. Yes, it is light on the system and the detection rate is outstanding - it found a spyware that no other program had, not Kaspersky and not any of many spyware detectors. But I found three serious problems with NOD32. First, too many false alarms, even with heuristics set to medium. It even found a &quot;probably unknown NewHeur_PE virus&quot; in a RAR archive containing only Word and PDF files from 6 years ago that hasn&#039;t been opened in years.

Second, I ran this first full scan with &quot;no cleaning&quot; because I wanted to look at the results first and decide what to do with them later; I was afraid it would delete some vital clean file by mistake. I was expecting to find some easy right-click option in the scan log, so I could either mark the file as safe, disinfect it or delete it, just as Kaspersky does. I found out that I just couldn&#039;t do it. For that, I had to either run another scan with the &quot;standard&quot; or &quot;strict&quot; option on and then work from the quarantine, or get out of the program and use the Explorer interface commands, after manually entering the exceptions one by one.

And third, the log contained *hundreds* of warnings about archives and software setup files that it simply couldn&#039;t parse to extract and scan. Nearly all of them were trivial ZIP and RAR archives or InstallShield executables that Kaspersky never misses.

I also didn&#039;t see anything like the real-time application behaviour analysis that Kaspersky does - it is even more annoying than UAC, but definitely a great added security value. I could perhaps add ThreatFire to do that, but it would be great if NOD32 included that feature.

I&#039;ll be giving NOD32 a couple of days more (not longer, because the trial version doesn&#039;t update the signatures more than once), then I&#039;ll try Avira, but I guess I&#039;ll be back to Kaspersky in the end. I still have almost a full year of its licence left, after all, and I like its features. I may supplement it with occasional Virustotal checks of specific files, and on-line system scans offered by many antivirus vendors (including ESET).

But I&#039;ve explored your blog and loved it, Michael! I intend to be a regular visitor. My compliments! :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s 4 months later now, and I&#8217;m already testing the commercially released NOD32 4.0. I&#8217;ve been a Kaspersky user for many years, but lately I&#8217;ve been submitting a few suspicious files to Virustotal and found that Kaspersky isn&#8217;t what it used to be any more and is missing way too much malware. Since I&#8217;m trying Windows 7 RC (in dual-boot with XP, where Kaspersky remains), I thought this could be a chance to try something else. Since NOD32 is so highly praised and works on Windows 7, a trial was more than in order. (Windows 7 is so good and stable, even at this RC stage, that I moan and groan when I have to boot to XP for some reason! I&#8217;m LOVING it!)</p>
<p>Well, I didn&#8217;t like it so far. Yes, it is light on the system and the detection rate is outstanding &#8211; it found a spyware that no other program had, not Kaspersky and not any of many spyware detectors. But I found three serious problems with NOD32. First, too many false alarms, even with heuristics set to medium. It even found a &#8220;probably unknown NewHeur_PE virus&#8221; in a RAR archive containing only Word and PDF files from 6 years ago that hasn&#8217;t been opened in years.</p>
<p>Second, I ran this first full scan with &#8220;no cleaning&#8221; because I wanted to look at the results first and decide what to do with them later; I was afraid it would delete some vital clean file by mistake. I was expecting to find some easy right-click option in the scan log, so I could either mark the file as safe, disinfect it or delete it, just as Kaspersky does. I found out that I just couldn&#8217;t do it. For that, I had to either run another scan with the &#8220;standard&#8221; or &#8220;strict&#8221; option on and then work from the quarantine, or get out of the program and use the Explorer interface commands, after manually entering the exceptions one by one.</p>
<p>And third, the log contained *hundreds* of warnings about archives and software setup files that it simply couldn&#8217;t parse to extract and scan. Nearly all of them were trivial ZIP and RAR archives or InstallShield executables that Kaspersky never misses.</p>
<p>I also didn&#8217;t see anything like the real-time application behaviour analysis that Kaspersky does &#8211; it is even more annoying than UAC, but definitely a great added security value. I could perhaps add ThreatFire to do that, but it would be great if NOD32 included that feature.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll be giving NOD32 a couple of days more (not longer, because the trial version doesn&#8217;t update the signatures more than once), then I&#8217;ll try Avira, but I guess I&#8217;ll be back to Kaspersky in the end. I still have almost a full year of its licence left, after all, and I like its features. I may supplement it with occasional Virustotal checks of specific files, and on-line system scans offered by many antivirus vendors (including ESET).</p>
<p>But I&#8217;ve explored your blog and loved it, Michael! I intend to be a regular visitor. My compliments! <img src='http://www.cravingtech.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Riel'z Bad's</title>
		<link>http://www.cravingtech.com/eset-nod32-version-4-public-beta-1-review-impression.html/comment-page-1#comment-10642</link>
		<dc:creator>Riel'z Bad's</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 22:42:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cravingtech.com/blog/?p=2284#comment-10642</guid>
		<description>hai ...

bagi nod v 4 donk ...

hahaha ...

riel&#039;z</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hai &#8230;</p>
<p>bagi nod v 4 donk &#8230;</p>
<p>hahaha &#8230;</p>
<p>riel&#8217;z</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Aulia</title>
		<link>http://www.cravingtech.com/eset-nod32-version-4-public-beta-1-review-impression.html/comment-page-1#comment-9384</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Aulia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 04:28:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cravingtech.com/blog/?p=2284#comment-9384</guid>
		<description>Yup, both are the best antivirus out there :)

I do have a link, but why bother if the public beta is going to be released in a few hours? (it&#039;s meant to be available for public on Friday 9th)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yup, both are the best antivirus out there <img src='http://www.cravingtech.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I do have a link, but why bother if the public beta is going to be released in a few hours? (it&#8217;s meant to be available for public on Friday 9th)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donace</title>
		<link>http://www.cravingtech.com/eset-nod32-version-4-public-beta-1-review-impression.html/comment-page-1#comment-9366</link>
		<dc:creator>Donace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 21:18:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cravingtech.com/blog/?p=2284#comment-9366</guid>
		<description>I personally love Kaspersky; fairly light weight and easy to use. Though NOD32 is very good as well; the main reason I still use Kaspersky is because of the free licence I got for it by my bank :p

Though the beta does look promising...sideline question...leaked Windows 7 beta? ... got a link :p

&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;Donace´s last blog post..&lt;a href=&quot;http://thenexus.tk/joint-ventures-a-look-at-partnership-law/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Joint Ventures - A look at partnership law&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I personally love Kaspersky; fairly light weight and easy to use. Though NOD32 is very good as well; the main reason I still use Kaspersky is because of the free licence I got for it by my bank :p</p>
<p>Though the beta does look promising&#8230;sideline question&#8230;leaked Windows 7 beta? &#8230; got a link :p</p>
<p><abbr><em>Donace´s last blog post..<a href="http://thenexus.tk/joint-ventures-a-look-at-partnership-law/" rel="nofollow">Joint Ventures &#8211; A look at partnership law</a></em></abbr></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
